The verdict: Not Guilty

February 26, 2009
By

Though even I thought I was technically guilty of being in the wrong place in the wrong truck, I was exonerated by my Budget receipt. Short term lease? Not guilty.

That makes sense: It was personal use, not commercial. But, in my (uneducated) reading of the code, it seemed that trucks of that size (double-axle or two-axles with six wheels) were considered “trucks” regardless of intent. More details later, and commentary on how glad I am that I didn’t check the “guilty” box and mail in a check.

(Side note: turns out the first-time fine is $200 + $80, not $40 + $60. This I learned because the case ahead of mine was also an off-route truck, same location, same officer (different truck: commercial). The points are still unclear; his license was already suspended. By the third offense? $1,000 to $2,000.)

4 Responses to The verdict: Not Guilty

  1. Lindsay de Castrique on March 2, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    You sound like you are making cases for the other side. What if the judge reads this blog and overturns your ruling? Stand by your “not guilty!”

  2. Pete on March 2, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    I stand by the concept of no double jeopardy.

  3. me/dad on March 3, 2009 at 12:20 am

    What should I do with all the “FREE PETE” tee shirts I had made?

  4. Pete on March 3, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    I guess you can return them to Cuba. Welcome back, by the way!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

RSS BELBYS THOTS

Public chatter

 

February 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728